AI Governance
EU AI Act Article 13 conformance
ARIA publishes a transparency statement with every high-risk decision path: model identity, confidence score, ethics-gate threshold applied, frameworks invoked, and upstream citations. The full per-decision log is exportable from the admin surface (see Model Transparency).
Ethics-gate thresholds
Per-tenant defaults live in orgs.ethics_gate_config. Operators can tighten but never loosen below the regulation floor.
| Context | Threshold |
|---|---|
| Base (default) | 0.85 |
| GDPR-regulated tenant | 0.92 |
| HIPAA-regulated tenant | 0.95 |
| EU AI Act high-risk path | 0.92 |
| CCPA-regulated tenant | 0.88 |
| Sandbox / exploration | 0.70 |
Decision-pattern catalogue
ARIA selects from a curated catalogue of evidence-based decision frameworks on every decision (selection rationale and citations available under Trust → AI Governance docs). Every selection is logged to the decision trajectory.
Sample explainability record
{
"decision": "route_to_agent",
"agent": "compliance-advisor",
"confidence": 0.93,
"decision_patterns_applied": [
"behavior-change-pattern",
"friction-reduction-pattern",
"gdpr-article-13"
],
"ethics_gate": {
"threshold": 0.92,
"passed": true,
"reason": "tenant_regulation=gdpr"
},
"trigger_stack": [
"social-proof-customer-count",
"retention-risk-signal"
]
}Brand-voice extraction (ADR-058)
ARIA's brand-voice extractor removes AI-tells on every customer-facing output. Example:
Our platform leverages cutting-edge AI to revolutionize your compliance workflow.
ARIA runs your compliance checks with grounded citations so audits stop being a month-long scramble.